Bug 243345

Summary:	Commenting blocks of text with wrapped lines does not work in Kile
Product:	[Applications] kile	Reporter:	Thomas Damgaard <thomasdn>
Component:	editor	Assignee:	Michel Ludwig <michel.ludwig>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	normal
Priority:	NOR
Version First Reported In:	2.0.85
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	Ubuntu
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Description Thomas Damgaard 2010-07-01 14:25:49 UTC

Version:           2.0.85 (using KDE 4.4.2) 
OS:                Linux

If you mark a block of text that contains long (wrapped) lines and then press Ctrol+D to make it a comment, the wrapped part of lines are not correctly commented.



Reproducible: Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
Steps to Reproduce:
1: Settings > Editor > Editing > Enabled static word wrap, wrap words at 80
characters.
2: Type in the following text on an empty line:

foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar foo bar


3: Then mark the blok of text.
4: Press Ctrl+D to prepend every line with '% '
5: Notice that wrapped lines are incorrectly handled.

Actual Results:  
This text is produced:

% foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo
bar % foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar % foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo
bar foo bar % foo bar foo bar
% foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo
bar % foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
foo bar % foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo
bar foo bar % foo bar foo bar

Expected Results:  
This text would be expected:

% foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo
% bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
% foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo
% bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
% foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo
% bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar
% foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar foo
% bar foo bar foo bar foo bar

Comment 1 Michel Ludwig 2010-07-03 19:55:16 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105373 ***