Summary: | battery monitor shows the AC adapter is plugged in at startup , but it's not | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Frameworks and Libraries] solid | Reporter: | rm <rm1232002> |
Component: | powermanagement-daemon | Assignee: | Dario Freddi <drf> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | aseigo, ervin |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: |
Description
rm
2010-04-18 21:06:03 UTC
if you add a new battery monitor when the first one is showing the wrong status, does the new battery monitor show the correct status or is it also incorrect? if you add a new battery monitor when the first one is showing the correct status, does the new battery monitor show the correct status as well? At start up , when it showed incorrect information , I added a new battery monitor widget to desktop. But it showed the same incorrect information , too. Then I removed that widget and after that I plugged in the AC adapter and then unplugged it. As I said above , this cause the battery monitor behaves normally.so the battery monitor showed the correct information. Then I added a new battery monitor widget and it showed the same correct information. Thanks a lot for your attention! ok, so it isn't the plasmoid itself: it is showing the data it is being sent correctly. and given that the data, sent by the powermanagement DataEngine, is simply forwarding on information from Solid, and there is no polling involved, then the problem is either in Solid or in HAL underneath it. (FYI: coming out of suspend is broken in many mysteriously and wonderous ways on Linux... still.) i'm reassigning this to Solid for now, adding Kevin to CC, and awating his response as to the HAL-ness of this problem ;) Thank you very much! I'm ready to do any test on my notebook to find out how can we solve this problem ;) Sounds a whole lot like the state change didn't get signaled on resume... *sigh* I see nothing we could do about apart from putting a workaround in powerdevil maybe? Let's reassign to Dario and see if he has an opinion about it. Fixed in 4.6 |