Summary: | Gamma error in picture scaling | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Frameworks and Libraries] kio-extras | Reporter: | hoea |
Component: | Thumbnails and previews | Assignee: | Plasma Bugs List <plasma-bugs> |
Status: | REPORTED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | a.samirh78, kdelibs-bugs, konq-bugs, mpyne, nate |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Gentoo Packages | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.ericbrasseur.org/gamma.html | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
hoea
2010-02-28 18:43:40 UTC
Please do note that the example is contrived to fail on algorithms that do not do perfect gamma correction internally (which is much slower). I personally would argue that having slower image scaling to be accurate to a given gamma would most of the time be a negative effect, especially in the context of a web browser. However it is true that most images are handled in a color space using gamma so mis-rendering of images is possible if not gamma-corrected in the colorspace used by the image. From what I understand if the image does not provide the gamma used (or otherwise define it) a good default choice is gamma = 2.2. Updated link: http://www.ericbrasseur.org/gamma.html |