Bug 223858

Summary:	[regression] Messenger contact field implementation incomplete
Product:	[Applications] kaddressbook	Reporter:	m.wege
Component:	general	Assignee:	kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	tokoe
Priority:	NOR
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	unspecified
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:

Description m.wege 2010-01-22 22:44:14 UTC

Version:           4.4 rc1 (using 4.3.90 (KDE 4.3.90 (KDE 4.4 RC1)), Kubuntu packages)
Compiler:          cc
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.31-18-generic

With the new KDE-Adressbook there is only a free textfield for messengers, which means you can not tell Kaddressbook to which messenger a contact belongs.

The consequence also seems to be that the online status of a contact is not shown in Kaddressbook anymore.

Also messenger contacts are not added to Kaddressbook if linked from Kopete.

Should I report this as three different bug reports or leave it in one as it appears they belong together.

Would be good if a fix for this would not need to wait until KDE 4.5, because inputs of messager contact people make until then would be kind of worthless. If it can not be fixed earlier, I would suggest to deactivate editing of the messenger field until then.

Comment 1 m.wege 2010-02-13 18:40:57 UTC

may be this bug is related to bug

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226622

Comment 2 Tobias Koenig 2010-03-07 13:33:20 UTC

SVN commit 1100381 by tokoe:

Bring back the edit fields for instant messaging

BUG: 223073
BUG: 223858
BUG: 226299



 M  +5 -0      CMakeLists.txt  
 A             editor/im (directory)  
 A             editor/im/CMakeLists.txt  
 A             editor/im/icons (directory)  
 A             editor/im/icons/CMakeLists.txt  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-aim_protocol.png  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-gadu_protocol.png  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-groupwise_protocol.png  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-icq_protocol.png  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-irc_protocol.png  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-jabber_protocol.png  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-meanwhile_protocol.png  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-msn_protocol.png  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-skype_protocol.png  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-sms_protocol.png  
 AM            editor/im/icons/ox16-app-yahoo_protocol.png  
 A             editor/im/imdelegate.cpp   [License: LGPL (v2+)]
 A             editor/im/imdelegate.h   [License: LGPL (v2+)]
 A             editor/im/imeditordialog.cpp   [License: GPL (v2+) (+Qt exception)]
 A             editor/im/imeditordialog.h   [License: GPL (v2+) (+Qt exception)]
 A             editor/im/immodel.cpp   [License: LGPL (v2+)]
 A             editor/im/immodel.h   [License: LGPL (v2+)]
 A             editor/im/improtocols.cpp   [License: LGPL (v2+)]
 A             editor/im/improtocols.h   [License: LGPL (v2+)]
 A             editor/im/kaddressbookimprotocol.desktop   [TRAILING SPACE]
 A             editor/im/protocols (directory)  
 A             editor/im/protocols/CMakeLists.txt  
 A             editor/im/protocols/aimprotocol.desktop   [TRAILING SPACE]
 A             editor/im/protocols/gaduprotocol.desktop   [TRAILING SPACE]
 A             editor/im/protocols/groupwiseprotocol.desktop   [TRAILING SPACE]
 A             editor/im/protocols/icqprotocol.desktop   [TRAILING SPACE]
 A             editor/im/protocols/ircprotocol.desktop  
 A             editor/im/protocols/jabberprotocol.desktop   [TRAILING SPACE]
 A             editor/im/protocols/meanwhileprotocol.desktop  
 A             editor/im/protocols/msnprotocol.desktop   [TRAILING SPACE]
 A             editor/im/protocols/skypeprotocol.desktop  
 A             editor/im/protocols/smsprotocol.desktop   [TRAILING SPACE]
 A             editor/im/protocols/yahooprotocol.desktop   [TRAILING SPACE]
 M  +84 -0     editor/imeditwidget.cpp  
 M  +9 -4      editor/imeditwidget.h  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1100381

Comment 3 m.wege 2010-03-07 13:45:03 UTC

Any chance this will be backported to 4.4?

Comment 4 Tobias Koenig 2010-03-07 13:52:05 UTC

No, because of the new strings that has been introduced