Bug 220626

Can you try this again with the final 1.0.0 release? http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/491

Yes, You must use last 1.0.0 stable release instead an old beta. This problem have already fixed.

Ask to your linux packager to update definitively digiKam package to last stable.

Gilles Caulier

On Tue December 29 2009 05:30:36 pm Johannes Wienke wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220626
>
>
> Johannes Wienke <languitar@semipol.de> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>- CC|                            |languitar@semipol.de
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from Johannes Wienke <languitar semipol de>  2009-12-30
> 02:30:35 --- Can you try this again with the final 1.0.0 release?
> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/491

I would love to be able to do that I know very little about the inner workings 
of Linux.  I use Ubuntu and install compiled applications from the 
repositories. The Ubuntu backports do not have digikam 1.0 in them yet.  
To compile from tarball it appears I have to install KDE4 and when I look for 
that I am presented with a most confusing array of options that mean little 
or nothing to me.
I guess I will have to wait until digikam 1.0 has been packaged.

Sorry, I would like to help.

Mac

Look there : http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/digikam

Gilles Caulier

On Wed December 30 2009 12:33:59 am Gilles Caulier wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220626
>
>
> Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>- Component|general                     |Image Editor
>             Version|unspecified                 |1.0.0
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com>  2009-12-30
> 09:33:58 --- Yes, You must use last 1.0.0 stable release instead an old
> beta. This problem have already fixed.
>
> Ask to your linux packager to update definitively digiKam package to last
> stable.
>
> Gilles Caulier

Thank You Giles

Mac

On Tue December 29 2009 05:30:36 pm Johannes Wienke wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220626
>
>
> Johannes Wienke <languitar@semipol.de> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>- CC|                            |languitar@semipol.de
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from Johannes Wienke <languitar semipol de>  2009-12-30
> 02:30:35 --- Can you try this again with the final 1.0.0 release?
> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/491

After trying several "how-tos" on compiling digikam from a tarball I found one 
that seemed to work, not the way the author said it would but it did not give 
me any errors.

I now have digikam 1.0.0 using KDE 4.3.2 installed on the test computer but I 
still cannot save edited files located on the DNS-323 NAS.

Giles sent a reply asking me to tell the package maintainers to add digiKam 
1.0.0 to the Ubuntu package.   Would that enable me to save images on an NAS 
and if so, how do I contact the package maintainers?

Mac

Ok, so this really is a bug.

The ubuntu thing is something else. Ubuntu packages beta5 with their release. A beta is what a beta is... possibly unstable. And we get so many reports from ubuntu users with bugs that are already fixed since beta5. We somehow need to convice the ubuntu team to update their digikam package and it helps if users request this.

Mac, please check for error messages on the console.
For this, first start "kdebugdialog" and ensure that code 50003 is checked. Then, start "digikam" from the command line and look if any error messages appear while you try to save the files.
To be sure, did you confirm from Help->About digikam that you're indeed running your self-compiled 1.0 version?

Yes Marcel, I did confirm from Help>About digikam and it says it is running
1.0.

I guess from what you say that I must wait for Ubuntu to update their
repositories with current packages.
I will install Kbuntu on a test system to see if it works but from what you
say, Kubuntu may also use the Ubuntu Repositories and I will be stuck at the
same spot.

Thanks for your advice.  I had wanted to change to 9.10 but may have to wait
for 10.04

Mac

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg@gmx.de>wrote:

> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220626
>
>
> Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg@gmx.de> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 CC|                            |marcel.wiesweg@gmx.de
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #8 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de>  2009-12-31
> 15:35:47 ---
> Mac, please check for error messages on the console.
> For this, first start "kdebugdialog" and ensure that code 50003 is checked.
> Then, start "digikam" from the command line and look if any error messages
> appear while you try to save the files.
> To be sure, did you confirm from Help->About digikam that you're indeed
> running
> your self-compiled 1.0 version?
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
> You reported the bug.
>

On Friday 01 January 2010 12:18:32 you wrote:
> I guess from what you say that I must wait for Ubuntu to update their
> repositories with current packages.

Mac,

Ubuntu have updated:

http://packages.ubuntu.com/digikam

Mark

> Yes Marcel, I did confirm from Help>About digikam and it says it is running
> 1.0.

Ok

> 
> I guess from what you say that I must wait for Ubuntu to update their
> repositories with current packages.

If you have upgraded manually, you can do the debugging, if Kubuntu really has new packages now, even better.

Mac,

What's new about this entry ?

Gilles Caulier

Mac,

This file still valid using digiKam 2.4 ?

Gilles Caulier

Hello Gilles:

I have been too busy to install recent upgrades so I do not know if
the problem has been solved.

After the new year when things have settled down I will do some
testing and let you know.

Thanks

Mac

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Gilles Caulier
<caulier.gilles@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220626
>
>
> Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
>         Resolution|                            |WAITINGFORINFO
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #13 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com>  2011-12-18 17:15:48 ---
> Mac,
>
> This file still valid using digiKam 2.4 ?
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
> You reported the bug.

New digiKam 4.11.0 is available :

https://www.digikam.org/node/740

Can you reproduce the problem with this release ?

With digiKam 5.0.0, this problem is not reproducible.
I close this file now. Don't hesitate to re-open if necessary.
Gilles Caulier