| Summary: | c++ support, function overloading, automatic definition update | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] kdevelop | Reporter: | Jörg Pfähler <bluecoder> |
| Component: | Language Support: CPP (old) | Assignee: | kdevelop-bugs-null |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | craftplace.ms, l.jirkovsky |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
confirmed Looks very similar to the bug #211652 I tried to reproduce the bug, and now the dialog is not displayed when completely written "int i" and does not change when you click on the dialog when the "int i" still is incomplete. Probably it is necessary to close. Hello! We are working on a new clang-based C/C++ language plugin for KDevelop 5 which supersedes the old C++ plugin in KDevelop 4. See e.g.: https://www.kdevelop.org/news/first-beta-release-kdevelop-500-available Due to a lack of manpower, we cannot fix bugs in the old C++ plugin. We rather want to supply a good Clang based C++ experience for KDevelop 5 than wasting our time on the legacy C++ support for KDevelop 4. With the new clang-based C/C++ language plugin, the bug presented here does not occur. In my testing. For these reasons, I'll close this bug. Please stay tuned for KDevelop 5. If you think this bug is applicable to Clang/KDevelop 5, please reopen the report and add new information on how to reproduce the bug there. Sorry for the inconvenience, I hope you understand the reasoning above. Cheers > Sorry for the inconvenience, I hope you understand the reasoning above.
Of course! I am actually quite happy that you switch to clang in favor of rolling your own parser.
|
Version: 0.9.95 (svn from 06.09.2009) (using KDE 4.3.1) Compiler: g++ 4.4.1 OS: Linux Installed from: Ubuntu Packages Consider the following piece of code struct test { void f(); void f(int i); }; void test::f() { } when you add the "int i" in the function definition you get an "update Definition" dialog, which is superfluous in this case and which alters the declaration of void f() (which is wrong, because it won't compile afterwards). See http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/1739/kdevelop4.png