|Summary:||JJ: ampache config dialog is confusing|
|Product:||[Applications] amarok||Reporter:||Sunil Khiatani <spawn57>|
|Component:||Services/Ampache||Assignee:||Amarok Developers <amarok-bugs-dist>|
|Severity:||normal||CC:||ian.monroe, kde-bugtracker, nhn, ry|
|Latest Commit:||Version Fixed In:||2.4|
Description Sunil Khiatani 2009-07-18 20:50:07 UTC
Version: 2.1 (using KDE 4.2.96) OS: Linux Installed from: Ubuntu Packages the dialog for configuring the ampache service is too confusing. The list box on the left is not effective: 1)It allows more me to add ampache servers with the same name more than once. 2) when I try to modify a value, pressing new accidentally will create a new entry with the same name. 3) it's just strange.. if it's possible can the listbox be changed to a drop down box that's placed above details. This allows clear separation and isolation. Also, instead of the buttons, use + and - buttons like KContactManager will uses, or KCalendar uses for distribution lists. It's a much more cleaner interface. Thanks for your time.
Comment 1 Mark Kretschmann 2009-09-11 13:22:41 UTC
It's a bit confusing indeed and could do with some cleanup. This isn't really a bug though.
Comment 2 Myriam Schweingruber 2009-09-11 13:26:18 UTC
Moving to wishlist, then.
Comment 3 Sunil Khiatani 2009-09-13 15:40:15 UTC
It felt like a bug to me because I kept making duplicate entries and deleting the wrong settings. Either way...thanks for the effort :)
Comment 4 Myriam Schweingruber 2009-09-13 15:45:10 UTC
On second thought, flagging this as a usability issue is more useful.
Comment 5 Myriam Schweingruber 2009-12-17 16:17:43 UTC
Any takers for a new Ampache configuration dialog?
Comment 6 Ryan Rix 2010-01-16 06:34:39 UTC
I'm willing to take a look at this as a small task this weekend. Will have a good talk with Jeff Mitchell on it.
Comment 7 Myriam Schweingruber 2010-01-16 10:37:06 UTC
(In reply to comment #6) > I'm willing to take a look at this as a small task this weekend. Will have a > good talk with Jeff Mitchell on it. Nice!
Comment 8 Myriam Schweingruber 2010-05-22 12:27:12 UTC
Comment 9 Ian Monroe 2010-09-26 18:48:03 UTC
Fixed in v2.3.2-48-g40151eb with a new table-based UI.