Summary: | Very poor usability when browsing JPEG and RAW files | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | DGardner <damien> |
Component: | Showfoto-RawProcessing | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles, mohammed.ahmed.anwer |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 0.10.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 4.0.0 | |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
DGardner
2009-06-15 19:07:40 UTC
Showfoto is simple, image viewer which has powerful editing possibilities thanks to imageplugins mechanisms. Most of workflow you described is - or should be in hopefully short time - possible in digiKam - real image *manager*. Many things you wished are already for long time in BKO as wishes for digiKam. The only thing I think wasn't wished for is canceling of RAW files loading. But I was able to switch to next image by clicking next one in thumbbar - without proper feedback though (the same problem exists for digiKam image editor). Thanks, Mikolaj. I'll fill you in a bit more on my workflow to give you an idea of where I am coming from and what I think I need from ShowFoto and/or digiKam. I use digiKam for all my image management, but I've had a few issues with it (and with me) in the past that make me feel safer if I keep the unmodified files from my camera in a separate location and then import renamed copies of those files into digiKam. That way, if anything goes wrong (either in digiKam or due to a PEBKAC), I'll always have an original file that I can copy again. I operate with two completely separate image archives: "Original" and "Organised". The "Original" archive contains the original images straight from the camera with no modifications other than the deletion of the irredeemable images. The "Organised" archive contains the renamed copies of the original images (I have my own renaming script based on Exiftool that uses MakerNote information for Canon file numbers that Exiv2 does not support). It is only the "Organised" archive that I manage with digiKam. Off the top of my head, I'd guess that there are about 20,000 images in each archive at present. Perhaps, what I need is to have two separate digiKam configurations for these two image archives. Each would have its own, independent image database and different digiKam settings. However, I do not know if this is possible. For example, in the "Original" archive, I would not use any tags and would not set any options that might modify the files, such as the automatic setting of the photographer's identity and the credit and copyright. In the "Organised" archive, I will use digiKam just as I do today with lots of tags and other settings to help me manage my images. The separation of the two archives means that I will not accidentally modify the original images when browsing the "Organised" archive and will not be distracted by duplicates of all of the images there (e.g., when browsing the time line, etc.). If I could do that (and maybe I can, but I just don't know how) I would be happy to use digiKam for both purposes. If this is not yet possible, then I would guess that making digiKam support two separate configurations for two separate archives would be easier than trying to support two different modes of operation for different groups of albums within a single archive, with all of the extra configuration options, menus, filters, etc. that that would entail. Every time I use ShowFoto, it disappoints: digiKam is so slick and polished that the myriad of immediately obvious problems with ShowFoto come as a bit of a shock. If digiKam could do what I wanted when just screening original images, I'd switch to it in a heartbeat. So, Mikolaj, do you know if digiKam can support separate configurations for completely separate archives? If not, would I be better off pushing for this change to digiKam rather than requesting enhancements and fixes for ShowFoto? Does ShowFoto have any future place in the longer term plans for the digiKam family of applications and libraries? Standard answer: wrapper script which will replace digikam config files when starting. For only basic replacement copy ~/.kde4/share/config/digikamrc for more robust copy of ~/.kde4/share/apps/digikam . Example of digikam_original (I assume some ground work was done by hand previously, I think you can guess what needs to be done): ------------------- #!/bin/bash cp -af ~/.digikam-profiles/digikamrc-original ~/.kde4/share/config/digikamrc cp -af ~/.digikam-profiles/digikam-original ~/.kde4/share/apps/digikam digikam cp -af ~/.kde4/share/config/digikamrc ~/.digikam-profiles/digikamrc-original cp -af ~/.kde4/share/apps/digikam ~/.digikam-profiles/digikam-original ------------------- Untested! Hi, Some issues in here are solved, and I think that no need to show the mime type on the thumbbnail because it's already showed in the tool tip overlay. The rest of wishes will be considered. Thanks, Mohamed Anwer |