Bug 190631

Summary: Problem when pressing <ENTER> on the "Cancel" button of KMessageBox::warningContinueCancelList
Product: [Unmaintained] kdelibs Reporter: Karai Csaba <cskarai>
Component: kdeuiAssignee: kdelibs bugs <kdelibs-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: aros, luisfe, mail, mpyne, rasasi78, samjnaa
Priority: NOR    
Version: 4.2.2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: openSUSE   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Description Karai Csaba 2009-04-25 16:41:04 UTC
Version:            (using KDE 4.2.2)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    SuSE RPMs

Hello,

I'm a developer of Krusader.
Reproducing the bug on KDE 4.2.2:

- call this KMessageBox function
- use <LEFT>,<RIGHT> keys to focus the "Cancel" button
- press <ENTER>

the response of the function will be KMessageBox::Continue while "Cancel" was focused.

Thanks,

    Csaba
Comment 1 Karai Csaba 2009-04-25 16:52:45 UTC
The same problem happens with KMessageBox::warningYesNoCancel.

Pressing <ENTER> on the focused item doesn't work.
Comment 2 Oswald Buddenhagen 2009-04-26 09:53:29 UTC
i think i'll have a laugh now. :P
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-commits&m=123570766516459&w=2 ff. and http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-commits&m=123825346815377&w=2 f. (part of that thread, but lists.kde.org's threading breaks, probably because of the long delay).
Comment 3 Michael Pyne 2009-04-26 22:36:27 UTC
SVN commit 959688 by mpyne:

I give up.

Revert "make default buttons" change. (http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=957338)

CCBUG:82014
CCBUG:148972
BUG:190631


 M  +0 -4      kdialog.cpp  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=959688
Comment 4 Michael Pyne 2009-04-26 22:37:36 UTC
SVN commit 959691 by mpyne:

Backport revert of auto-default button change to KDE 4.2.

CCBUG:190631


 M  +0 -4      kdialog.cpp  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=959691
Comment 5 Michael Pyne 2009-04-30 00:40:52 UTC
*** Bug 190994 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Jaime Torres 2009-04-30 10:09:29 UTC
*** Bug 189845 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Christoph Feck 2009-05-31 00:42:06 UTC
*** Bug 194353 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Christoph Feck 2009-06-01 01:13:47 UTC
*** Bug 194698 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Michael Pyne 2009-07-04 21:24:06 UTC
*** Bug 198944 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***