Bug 189250

Summary:	editing a canon camera jpeg adds broken sRGB profile
Product:	[Applications] digikam	Reporter:	Tobias Schula <tobias>
Component:	ColorManagement-Profiles	Assignee:	Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal
Priority:	NOR
Version:	1.0.0
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	Ubuntu
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:	1.0.0
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments:	modified with digikam

Description Tobias Schula 2009-04-10 01:46:29 UTC

Version:           0.10 (using KDE 4.2.2)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Ubuntu Packages

When editing and saving a picture made with my Canon Powershot A540 in digikam's built in image editor it adds a wrong sRGB profile, the white point has the wrong value. Instead of D65 it is set at D50. So the resulting image has got a nasty blue tint. 

In digikam itself this is not visible but viewing the resulting image with a colour correction capable software makes it obvious. It also affects photographic prints if this profile is embedded the resulting pictures also have this tint.

This Bug prevents me from using this software because I send a lot of my pictures to printing services and the tints are awful.

I will add some pictures to specify my problem.

Comment 1 Tobias Schula 2009-04-10 01:49:01 UTC

Created attachment 32735 [details]
modified with digikam

Comment 2 Tobias Schula 2009-04-10 02:02:14 UTC

Comment on attachment 32735 [details]
modified with digikam

for unmodified source look here: http://schula.org/bugreports/kde/digikam/IMG_3177.JPG

Comment 3 caulier.gilles 2009-04-17 08:37:27 UTC

SVN commit 955139 by cgilles:

digiKam 0.11.0 : Color Management : use SRGB D60 color profile intead sRGB D50 for 
standard JPEG file if no profile is embeded by camera.
CCBUGS: 189250


 M  +2 -2      dimgloader.cpp  
 M  +1 -1      dimgloader.h  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=955139

Comment 4 caulier.gilles 2009-04-17 09:05:07 UTC

Tobias,

I think it's good now : 

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3344/3448933155_60438d85ae_o.png

Gilles Caulier

Comment 5 Tobias Schula 2009-04-17 15:10:43 UTC

Thanks a lot, Gilles!

Comment 6 Christopher Smith 2009-05-10 06:56:57 UTC

I came here with the same issue on the same version under Gentoo.  Thanks for the quick update!