| Summary: | wrong visualization of pdf | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] okular | Reporter: | Federico Muciaccia <federico1988fm> |
| Component: | PDF backend | Assignee: | Okular developers <okular-devel> |
| Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | federico1988fm |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | 0.8.1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: | test document | ||
|
Description
Federico Muciaccia
2009-03-22 19:37:30 UTC
Please attach a sample document showing the issue. Also, which version of poppler-qt4 do you have installed? Created attachment 32361 [details]
test document
a document that is bad visualized by okular
[federico@archlinux-laptop ~]$ pacman -Si poppler Repository : extra Nome : poppler Versione : 0.10.2-1 URL : http://poppler.freedesktop.org/ Licenze : GPL custom Gruppi : Nessuno Fornisce : Nessuno Dipende da : libjpeg gcc-libs>=4.3.2 cairo>=1.8.6 libxml2>=2.6.32-5 fontconfig>=2.6.0 Dip. opzionali : Nessuno Conflitti con : Nessuno Sostituisce : Nessuno Dimensione pkg : 4939,49 K Kb richiesti : 15564,00 K Autore : Jan de Groot <jgc@archlinux.org> Architettura : i686 Creato il : ven 26 dic 2008 17:55:39 CET Somma MD5 : 46f6ce5af8af06e56452a47e3fe59d83 Descrizione : PDF rendering library based on xpdf 3.0 [federico@archlinux-laptop ~]$ pacman -Si poppler-qt Repository : extra Nome : poppler-qt Versione : 0.10.2-1 URL : http://poppler.freedesktop.org/ Licenze : GPL Gruppi : Nessuno Fornisce : Nessuno Dipende da : qt>=4.4.3 poppler>=0.10.2 Dip. opzionali : Nessuno Conflitti con : Nessuno Sostituisce : Nessuno Dimensione pkg : 206,07 K Kb richiesti : 656,00 K Autore : Jan de Groot <jgc@archlinux.org> Architettura : i686 Creato il : ven 26 dic 2008 18:00:05 CET Somma MD5 : 7146f321871574f79bceda90b867c992 Descrizione : Poppler Qt bindings Hi, Okular does not render PDF documents by itself, but uses a 3rd party library called Poppler. You should please report the problem to the Poppler's bug tracking system at https://bugs.freedesktop.org, "poppler" product. Thank you for the report. Bug forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20955 @Pino Toscano: I don't think that bugs should be closed as "RESOLVED as UPSTREAM" before a bug is effectively forwarded in the "upsteam" bugtracker. Ok: this is not a bug of KDE, but affects KDE too, so be careful! If I were a very lazy (or a very busy) user? (I'm not :-P) Just think: The bug is marked as RESOLVED, it can have hundreds of duplicates, but no one is working in fixing it! Until a bug is fixed upstream the bug should be marked as "FORWARDED to ..." (like on Launchpad) I'm surprised there isn't such option in the bug status (is there? I am blind?) Should I fill a bug report for the KDE bugzilla? A wish maybe? Federico Muciaccia (In reply to comment #5) > Bug forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20955 Thanks. > @Pino Toscano: > I don't think that bugs should be closed as "RESOLVED as UPSTREAM" before a bug > is effectively forwarded in the "upsteam" bugtracker. I do, especially when they are not KDE issues. > The bug is marked as RESOLVED, it can have hundreds of duplicates, but no one > is working in fixing it! If there will be the same problem reported again on KDE's bugzilla, it will be closed as duplicate of this one, no big deal. > Until a bug is fixed upstream the bug should be marked as "FORWARDED to ..." > (like on Launchpad) Comparing with Launchpad is wrong. KDE is not a distribution. It does not need to know the right versions of *all* the products to track for getting their latest version in the next release. > I'm surprised there isn't such option in the bug status (is there? I am blind?) > > Should I fill a bug report for the KDE bugzilla? > A wish maybe? RESOLVED/UPSTREAM is the correct status for that, and we agreed upon that recently. This bug should now be fixed upstream: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/commit/?id=fbdf127904c26714ed69c2c1298c6eb7d564031e It was a freetype2 bug. taken from https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20955 : ------- Comment #2 From Albert Astals Cid 2009-03-30 15:22:11 PST ------- For some reason freetype fails to render the character i've mailed the freetypedevels. ------- Comment #3 From Albert Astals Cid 2009-04-01 10:16:23 PST ------- As said, not our bug, a freetype one that has been fixed once i reported it,see http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/commit/id=fbdf127904c26714ed69c2c1298c6eb7d564031e > RESOLVED/UPSTREAM is the correct status for that, and we agreed upon that recently. Should I change the status to RESOLVED as FIXED or leave it to RESOLVED as UPSTREAM now? Does it make any difference? > Should I change the status to RESOLVED as FIXED or leave it to RESOLVED as
> UPSTREAM now?
"FIXED" means "the bug is our, and we fixed it".
Given that this is not the case, please don't change the status of this bug. Thanks.
|