Bug 183186

Summary: [Windows] OSD configuration dialog permits only to move the OSD and forbids every other action
Product: [Applications] amarok Reporter: Diego <diego.ml>
Component: generalAssignee: Amarok Bugs <amarok-bugs-null>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: kraplax, myriam, ps_ml
Priority: NOR    
Version First Reported In: 2.0.1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Microsoft Windows   
OS: Microsoft Windows   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Description Diego 2009-02-04 15:32:38 UTC
Version:           2.0.1 (using 4.2.00 (KDE 4.2.0), MS Visual Studio 2005 SP1)
Compiler:          cl.exe
OS:                Microsoft Windows (i686) release 5.1 (XP Professional)

How to reproduce:
- go to "Settings", "Configure Amarok", and then choose "On screen display".

The only action you can do when you click in the area of the Amarok window is to move the OSD itself, even if you're not clicking on it, even if you're trying (desperately) to click on the "Ok" button.

The only workaround is to click outside the Amarok window to "disable" the "OSD Preview - Drag to reposition" on screen display. Then you can click "Ok" or everywhere else and keep using Amarok. Hovewer, if you click on "Playback", and then again on "On Screen Display" the issue remains.
Comment 1 Mikko C. 2009-02-04 16:44:48 UTC
I can confirm this.
Comment 2 Mark Kretschmann 2009-02-05 07:51:25 UTC
@SaroEngels: Hey Patrick, got any ideas on this one? :)
Comment 3 Patrick Spendrin 2009-02-05 10:38:25 UTC
Hm, no not really, the bug is known, iirc this is some problem with Qt itself (or how the osd is programmed).
Comment 4 Helge Stenström 2009-02-06 12:58:03 UTC
Pressing ESC seems to end the "move OSD" mode.
Comment 5 Diego 2009-05-26 15:05:28 UTC
Still here in the latest nightly build (26/05/09).
Comment 6 Carlo Segato 2009-06-15 17:05:18 UTC
SVN commit 982341 by segato:

use Tool instead of Popup on windows, so it won't steal focus
BUG:183186


 M  +1 -1      Osd.cpp  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=982341
Comment 7 Eduard Sukharev 2009-06-18 15:31:06 UTC
*** Bug 172185 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***