Summary: | edit previews happen too soon in showphoto | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Ryan McCoskrie <ryan.mccoskrie> |
Component: | Showfoto-Core | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | wishlist | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Fedora RPMs | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 7.6.0 | |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Ryan McCoskrie
2008-10-28 22:38:51 UTC
lease, can you describe better the problem, because i think that it have been fixed in 0.9.5 and 0.10.0, but i'm bot sure? Gilles Caulier Ryan, This file still valid using showfoto for KDE4 ? Andi, Mik, Can you reproduce (and understand) this problem ? Gilles Caulier He is talking about that some effects will render immediately when changing settings (for example the blur amount slider). Some imageplugins take quite a while, so this can be annoying. Andi Ok, now i understand. But for long preview rendering, there are progress bar displayed. Also, i remember that you have fixed preview rendering event to always use "Try" button. Right ? Gilles Caulier Not in all plugins... only those that consume a lot of rendering time. But at least every plugin should have a timer, right? So it might not fire directly... this should be true for every plugin nowadays. It's already the case. A timer is used (500ms) to post an event to refresh preview when a settings is changed somewhere, especially with slider... Gilles Caulier I understand: when you make some adjustments in plugin by slider or changing value by button or moving points in levels/curves digiKam tries to compute preview almost immediately after change. When you are not very precise with your movements it can take several tries to achieve good result. And after each hesitation digiKam starts crunching introducing unnecessary delays. Is it really 500ms? I have impression this is faster. Also reporter has older version of digikam where this problem was much worse. Ryan - could you test with latest digiKam 0.9.4 or even 0.10-beta7? With those releases I think your report could be marked as INVALID. ...I won't change it to INVALID because is a fixed problem even if the reporting and fixing were unrelated events. |