Bug 167459

Summary: konqueror use too much ram
Product: [Applications] konqueror Reporter: giuseppe <metrobotte>
Component: generalAssignee: Konqueror Developers <konq-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal CC: andresbajotierra
Priority: NOR    
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Compiled Sources   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Description giuseppe 2008-07-26 01:43:52 UTC
Version:           4.1.00 (using Devel)
Installed from:    Compiled sources
OS:                Linux

After using konqueror
i close it.
I run ksysguard and konqueror(closed)
is still alive,5 konqueror instances and use
119mb of ram.
Comment 1 Dario Andres 2008-07-27 19:33:04 UTC
Version 4.1.00 (KDE 4.0.99 (4.1 RC1+)) (KDEmod)
I can't reproduce that behaviour. Can you describe more the situation? (how many tabs/windows were opened, what URL, SVN version,...). Can you reproduce this bug now?
Comment 2 giuseppe 2008-07-30 03:46:41 UTC
Simple.
Now i have one instance of konqueror
opened,with two tabs.
ps uax return
giuseppe  3662  0.0  1.8  61504 18792 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121735411500000032570035_1217370110_128507
giuseppe  3663  0.0  1.2  55900 12916 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121735518300000032570039_1217370110_128738
giuseppe  3664  0.0  1.2  55900 12920 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121735545200000032570042_1217370110_128905
giuseppe  3665  0.0  1.2  55980 12916 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121735548600000032570044_1217370110_129089
giuseppe  3666  0.0  1.2  55980 12916 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121735554000000032570046_1217370110_129261
giuseppe  3667  0.0  1.2  55900 12920 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121735559800000032570048_1217370110_129678
giuseppe  3668  0.0  1.2  55980 12916 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121735568100000032570050_1217370110_129529
giuseppe  3669  0.0  1.2  55900 12916 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121736487200000032570053_1217370110_129847
giuseppe  3670  0.0  1.2  55980 12920 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121736544900000032570055_1217370110_129284
giuseppe  3676  0.0  1.2  55980 12920 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121736563300000032570059_1217370110_130014
giuseppe  3677  0.0  1.2  55920 12916 ?        S    03:43   0:00 konqueror -session 10be6c6163000121736664000000032570062_1217370110_129811
giuseppe  3715  0.4  3.2  86004 33876 ?        S    03:43   0:01 /opt/kde4/bin/konqueror --silent
giuseppe  3786  5.3  5.5 154932 57676 ?        S    03:46   0:14 konqueror -mimetype text/html http://www.napolisoccer.net/public/forum/index.php?showtopic=33338&view=getnewpost

when i close konqueror
i assume those sessions must be closed..
but they are all still active and use ram
Comment 3 Dario Andres 2008-07-30 20:20:25 UTC
giuseppe: thanks for replying :)

I'm using:
Version 4.1.00 (KDE 4.1.0) (KDEmod) in ArchLinux i686:

At a first time, "ps uax" returned me something like you posted above. (I was using konqueror for confirming bugs ;) ). And then I closed the windows, but these "konqueror -session" remained.

Then I killed all konqueror instances using "killall konqueror"

All the "konqueror -session" dissapeared.

---

Now with a "konqueror-clean" system I checked it one more time. Opening a konqueror window with two tabs (Google), ps uax returned:

dario     3548 13.0  3.3 105800 34856 ?        S    15:10   0:02 /usr/bin/konqueror --silent

After closing the konqueror window:

dario     3548  5.8  3.4  85888 35236 ?        S    15:10   0:02 /usr/bin/konqueror --silent

After some time (~2minutes):

dario     3548  0.9  3.4  85888 35236 ?        S    15:10   0:02 /usr/bin/konqueror --silent

So, that confirms that konqueror didn't finished their instances when closing their windows. That may have some purpouse, but it left behind a lot of "-session" instances. I think this need to be fixed (or explained).
Comment 4 Dario Andres 2008-07-31 23:25:05 UTC
Now, this should be marked as duplicate of bug 167826
Comment 5 George Kiagiadakis 2008-07-31 23:45:41 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 167826 ***