| Summary: | Tabs on left/right side | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] konqueror | Reporter: | Dotan Cohen <kde-2011.08> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Konqueror Developers <konq-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | bugs.kde.org, graeme |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: | Firefox with tabs on left side. | ||
|
Description
Dotan Cohen
2008-07-08 20:49:40 UTC
Created attachment 25954 [details]
Firefox with tabs on left side.
In this screenshot of Firefox with the tabs on the side and the KDE.org webpage
open, it can be seen that even with the tabs on the side there is horizontal
space unused in most webpages. Vertical space, however, is valuable (especially
on widescreen monitors).
It should be noted that the newest Opera builds support vertical tabs (tabs on the side) out of the box. Please consider this. It the key reason that Firefox remains my main browser: nothing handles large numbers of tabs open at once as well as FF + tree style tabs (my typical usage is something like 20 tabs on 15 sites open). I really want more than mere putting tabs on the left though. A * collapsible tree* of tabs (as provided by the Firefox extension) on the left is the most productive (i.e. in terms of finding the tab one wants to move to quickly) solution. > A * collapsible tree* of tabs (as provided by the Firefox extension) on > the left is the most productive (i.e. in terms of finding the tab one > wants to move to quickly) solution. Graeme is referring to this extension: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5890 I agree 100%. This is probably the most productivity-enhancing software that I have installed besides Kontact. This is a must feature for any web browser! While the other bugreport is younger, it is where the activity is, so closing this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 205276 *** |