Summary: | "kmail" is a very KDE2-ish name. Change it ! | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Unmaintained] kmail | Reporter: | Aldoo <aldo-public> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
Severity: | wishlist | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Aldoo
2008-03-31 13:45:57 UTC
KMail is an established name. It would be a bad idea to rename a well-known application. The same goes for Konqueror. If it gets rewritten as a new application, then it may make sense (see Mailody for a possible replacement). That's what happened with KPDF/Okular, KHexEdit/Okteta. Codeine was never a well-known application. And it's not a "KDE2-ish" name anyways. Ok, there was no renaming of important apps. I agree that could be some traumatism... but not as bad as switching from konqueror to dolphin as a default file manager, or quite equivalent to the one of replacing kpdf with okular (ok not the same app, but same usage, and kpdf does not exist anymore). I believed that in such a major event (KDE 3 -> 4) such small traumatisms were allowed. And by the way, who still runs kmail outside of kontact nowadays ? (ok ok maybe there are some people who do so... ) Mailody is a good name, but I don't think the name alone will be enough for making me use that client instead of kmail (maybe when it will be integrated in kontact... ). Anyway, that was just an idea that passed my mind this morning. If you think it was bad, don't act ! |