Summary: | NT_ACCESS_DENIED error when installing a samba printer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Unmaintained] kdeprint | Reporter: | Arnout Boelens <a.m.p.boelens> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | KDEPrint Devel Mailinglist <kde-print-devel> |
Status: | RESOLVED UNMAINTAINED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | jlayt |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Debian testing | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Arnout Boelens
2007-06-19 22:15:48 UTC
And how is this a bug? And why a bug that should be reported against KDEPrint?? What happens is this: you are trying to anonymously access a Windows resource that is not accessible for anonymous users. You get "access denied" (rightly so). Next you try to access the same resource, this time not anonymously (user "guest" is a valid account) and you get in. (And you do not need to repeat the scan because the wizard cached the results of the last scan and still displays them). The same will happen, if you used the "smbclient" commandline utility, once with the "-U%" parameter (no loginname, no password), and once with "-Uguest%" ("guest" loginname, no password), and once with "-Uguest%secret" ("guest" loginname, password used: "secret"), depending on wether your Windows allows empty passwords for guest or not. Can you elaborate on why this should be regarded as a bug of KDEPrint? (Otherwise I'll close this report.) Thanks. I think this is a kdeprint bug because I am using the kdeprint wizard to add a printer and it doesn't work as expected. What I would expect, is that I can always scan the whole network and then get an access denied error when I actually try to access a server with the wrong authentication. Right now the following happens: I can only scan the network and find the server I want to connect to, being an anonymous user, but I can only connect to this server as a guest. As a result I have to follow the procedure above. Would it work if the network scan is alway perform as an anonymous user and that the login info (anonymous, guest or username) is only used when accessing a server? Let me understand you right: are you saying that the *scanning* itself does only work as anonymous user, but does not work as user "guest"? And that therefor you first need to scan anonymously? Yes, that is correct. KDEPrint is obsolete, unmaintained and will never be revived. Closing all open bugs. |