Summary: | Suggestion for tagging images | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Gandalf Lechner <gandalflechner> |
Component: | Tags-Engine | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 7.6.0 | |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Gandalf Lechner
2007-06-16 11:48:39 UTC
I like this idea very much, 20 votes from me. I use kmail's move dialog quite often, and find it very convenient. But what is different (apart from the shortcut) from using the right side-bar "Comments/Tags" which does have an incremental search box, behaving precisely as described? Best, Arnd Have you tried kmails move dialog? It needs exactly three steps: 1. Shortcut "m" ("t") 2. Typing the first letters of the movetarget (tag) 3. Hitting Enter Even assuming an existing shortcut, I don't manage to be nearly as quick with the tag tree filter in the comments/tags side bar. But maybe I am missing something? Besides, I wouldn't want the side bar always open, while tagging my pictures. On Saturday 16 June 2007 13:52:57 Arnd Baecker wrote:
[bugs.kde.org quoted mail]
Well the difference is that using the sidebar, one has to switch between
keyboard and mouse, which makes tagging much slower. Try the move mail
command in kmail and you get the idea what would be great to have in digikam,
too.
Regards,
Gandalf
>
> Best, Arnd
OK, thanks a lot for the explanation! Actually, I just realized that this has also been discussed in http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114465 in particular #9. So should this be considered as duplicate? Best, Arnd On Saturday 16 June 2007 15:01:04 Arnd Baecker wrote: [bugs.kde.org quoted mail] oh yes, I didn't see that one > So should this be considered as duplicate? > > Best, Arnd OK, marked as a duplicate - please transfer your votes to http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114465 Also it might be worth to add the comments here to that one for completeness. Thanks for the suggestion (and yes, it would indeed be nice if this could get implemented ... ;-) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 114465 *** Fixed with https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114465 |