| Summary: | mentions KAddressBook in the user messages | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] konversation | Reporter: | Albert Astals Cid <aacid> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Konversation Bugs <konversation-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Albert Astals Cid
2006-08-27 16:30:25 UTC
I'm not sure I agree, to be honest. If we can't use applications names, why do we have them? Let's extend this to one of our stronger brands, Konqueror. Do we need to say "KDE file manager" instead? Conversely, "KDE email client" instead of KMail? "KDE calculator" instead of KCalc? Plus, this one here is actually tied to KAddressBook in a technological sense, too. Some house keeping here - I'm still convinced that it's better to tout KDE brands like KAddressBook. |