| Summary: | kpdf ignores duplex printing options and always uses duplex | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Unmaintained] kpdf | Reporter: | Eddy Flas <verslenet-kde> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Albert Astals Cid <aacid> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Eddy Flas
2006-07-24 16:19:42 UTC
Well, the bug is right and wrong. Right kpdf ignores duplex setting. Wrong we don't force it, we always disable it. "How? If i get it forced" you may ask. That is because poppler is not using real kpdf but a heavily patched one. Thanks you for your comments. I had difficulties understanding your reply because the relation between kpdf and poppler was far from clear to me. After much reading, I deduced that official stable KDE releases still use xpdf as a renderer for Kpdf (even though poppler will replace xpdf in the future) and that because they find it more convenient the Kubuntu team has replaced the offical Kpdf by a non offical patched one using poppler. Is my understanding correct ? If this is correct, this bug shouldn't have been placed here. In your opinion, should I open a bug against poppler or Kubuntu (or both)? Thanks for your time and your work. Spoke with kdeprint developers and told me the correct thing to do is ALWAYS create the ps in kpdf without duplex and kdeprint will add the duplex options if the user selected them. So kpdf is correct and the bug is in ubuntu's kpdf. I'm closing this bug and you should open one in their side. I've just stumpled upon this issue too. Here are the corresponding (K)Ubuntu and Gentoo bug reports: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/kdegraphics/+bug/54154 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148259 |