Summary: | Images not sorted in HTML Album Export | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Mark Ovens <marko> |
Component: | Plugin-Generic-HTMLGallery | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | FreeBSD Ports | ||
OS: | FreeBSD | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 5.7.0 |
Description
Mark Ovens
2006-05-23 17:13:07 UTC
Just a curiosity, if you use kameraclient from another host application (e.g. gwenview) and use HTML Export always there what do you optain? I've installed gwenview and it lists the files on the camera, and downlaods them in the correct (date/name) order - althought it doesn't show thumbnails, just the filenames arranged *vertically*, like this: I M G _ 1 1 5 0 JP G Does this mean that the bug is actually in digikam? I wasn't sure whether it was digikam or kipi, but kipi seem the most likely culprit. Forgot to mention in the pervious comment that when I run Export HTML Album on the same directory as digikam that the index page _is_ created in the correct order. So I guess that it is a digikam problem? Aurelien and digikam developers any comment? Witch digiKam release you use exactly ? Gilles > Witch digiKam release you use exactly ?
0.8.1 built from the FreeBSD ports.
Gilles do you think it's a digikam's problem? I suspect now that it may well be a digikam bug. I reformatted the CF card in my camera, took some photos and when I connected it to digikam the thumbnails were displayed with the last pic first and the first pic last, but all th others in the correct order, e.g. IMG_009, IMG_002, IMG_003, ..... IMG_008, IMG_001 but as the thumbnails were being created it did so in the correct order, i.e. IMG_001 was first and IMG_009 last. gwenview lists them in the correct order as do several Windows apps. Digikam appears to be the only thing that get's it wrong. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 134037 *** With new HTML Gallery tool from digiKam core, this problem is not reproducible. Gilles Caulier |