Summary: | Digikam way to save and delete "Searches" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Fri13 <friiduh> |
Component: | Searches-Engine | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | wishlist | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 0.8.1 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | openSUSE | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 0.9.4 | |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Fri13
2006-04-18 00:14:40 UTC
This would work for simple searches. However, the logic breaks slightly when the search is for 'Images with a date before 1234 and after 0101 and album contains Fred and rating greater than 3'. I suppose if the code just picks the first search term as the search name it would work though. I do like the concept of the delete button though, as it reduces right-button clicking for context menus. That would be only for simple searches, i dont know but i think most normal users just use simple search more often than advance. In advance you need type other informations and use mouse more than in simple search. So my idea would just make simple search easier :-) KMail has a good example of how this could be implemented. When searching (equivalent to Digikam's Advanced Search) the dialogue contains a lineedit which allows the user to select the name of the virtual folder that displays the search results. The default value is "Last Search". Essentially, instead of requiring Digikam to name the search based on the criteria the user gives it an arbitrary name. Wow, never mind. This functionality is already implemented. As far as the bug is concerned, I'm not sure there exists a better way to implement saving searches. Current digiKam version has better search panel now, so this kind isn't anymore needed. Paristo, You want mean KDE3 or KDE4 searches panel is better ? Gilles Caulier |