| Summary: | missing Comment= in .desktop | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] KEXI | Reporter: | Andrew Ziem <andrewz> |
| Component: | General | Assignee: | Jarosław Staniek <staniek> |
| Status: | CLOSED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | ||
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Fedora RPMs | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Andrew Ziem
2006-04-06 01:38:39 UTC
Rex Dieter said the following, On 2006-04-06 14:42:
> Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>
>>http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125005
>>
>>Is this true we should add Comment field? Or just switch from GenericName to
>>Comment?
>
>
> It appears the bugreport is more about empty Comments, ie,
> Comment=
> for which gnome produces an error (a GNOME bug, IMO).
>
> But, the submitter has a point that koffice's .desktop files should have
> some form of Comment. I don't think Comment should take over what is
> currently used for GenericName, however. Note the "should not be
> redundant" part of:
> http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ar01s04.html
> which says:
> GenericName: Generic name of the application, for example "Web Browser".
> Comment: Tooltip for the entry, for example "View sites on the
> Internet", should not be redundant with Name or GenericName.
Thanks for these notes; adding such field doesn't harm, so I guess I will add
the following for Kexi 1.1 and later:
Comment=Develop desktop database applications
BTW, Other KOffice developers: I propose to do the same for other apps,
eventually post proposals here.
Missing Comment is not a bug Missing Comment is not a bug |