Summary: | Parse Spam Status from MailScanner headers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Unmaintained] kmail | Reporter: | Thanos Kyritsis <djart> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED UNMAINTAINED | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | luigi.toscano |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 1.8 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Slackware | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Thanos Kyritsis
2005-03-30 15:33:45 UTC
Can you point me to a detailed description of the possible content in the MailScanner headers? I would need to know all variants to be able to provide a serious implementation. Unfortunatelly, MailScanner devs don't provide such a detailed description of the possible content in the MailScanner headers. The headers follow this format: X-*-MailScanner-SpamCheck: with a detailed SA scoring information, for example: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.102,required 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.50, BAYES_00 -2.60) and there is also this: X-*-MailScanner-SpamScore: header which will by default contain 1 's' for every point of the SpamAssassin score. All you need to do is measure the number of 's' characters and you have the score. Or you can take it directly from the X-*-MailScanner-SpamCheck header. Thank you for your feature request. Kmail1 is currently unmaintained so we are closing all wishes. Please feel free to reopen a feature request for Kmail2 if it has not already been implemented. Thank you for your understanding. Instead of creating a new feature request, please confirm here if the wishlist is still valid for kmail2. To be honest, it's been 7 years since I reported it, no hard feelings there though, I know it was never a top priority or a major feature, but I've switched several Desktop Environments and mail clients since then :) (for totally different reasons), but I'm still on the same Open Source "train". I propose we close this feature request for the time being and if/when I move back to Kmail, I will certainly look for this feature once more :) Best Wishes Thank you for the feedback. |