<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.kde.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugs.kde.org/"
          
          maintainer="sysadmin@kde.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>78159</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-03-21 19:12:34 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>don&apos;t expire important threads</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-09-14 12:17:01 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>10</classification_id>
          <classification>Unmaintained</classification>
          <product>kmail</product>
          <component>general</component>
          <version>1.6.1</version>
          <rep_platform>unspecified</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>NOR</priority>
          <bug_severity>wishlist</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>0</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Felix Berger">bflat1</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="kdepim bugs">pim-bugs-null</assigned_to>
          <cc>damir.perisa</cc>
    
    <cc>schaarsc</cc>
          
          <cf_commitlink></cf_commitlink>
          <cf_versionfixedin></cf_versionfixedin>
          <cf_sentryurl></cf_sentryurl>
          <votes>0</votes>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>217759</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Berger">bflat1</who>
    <bug_when>2004-03-21 19:12:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Version:           1.6.1 (using KDE 3.2.1,  (testing/unstable))
Compiler:          gcc version 3.3.3 (Debian)
OS:          Linux (i686) release 2.4.21-rc1

It would be a great feature to not expire messages and whole threads which are specially marked:

Either add an extra marker like: &quot;Never Expire Message&quot; and &quot;Never Expire Thread&quot;
or change the Important Marker&apos;s semantics.

Thus one could mark one&apos;s own threads in mailing list folders as &quot;Never Expire&quot; and let the rest expire gracefully.

I had a look at maildirjob.cpp and it doesn&apos;t seem difficult to implement for messages. How it would be done for whole threads I don&apos;t know.

Sincerely,
Felix Berger</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>217772</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Till Adam">adam</who>
    <bug_when>2004-03-21 19:45:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Implemented in head. Settings -&gt; Misc -&gt; Exclude important messages from 
expiry. :)

</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>382182</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Damir Perisa">damir.perisa</who>
    <bug_when>2005-10-17 20:53:29 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>would it be possible to also be able to configure kmail that the whole thread to not expire, if one message is marked somehow special? especially in discussions on high-frequency mailinglists (like kernel mailinglist) it is useful to have this.

if needed, i can also open a new wish, but i think, because it&apos;s related to this one, i can recycle it - saving the environment ;-)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>382209</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="David Faure">faure</who>
    <bug_when>2005-10-17 22:48:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Right, the &quot;exclude important&quot; thing is only for messages, not for entire threads (afaik), so this wish can&apos;t really be closed yet.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>382212</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Damir Perisa">damir.perisa</who>
    <bug_when>2005-10-17 23:00:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>may i suggest, that we enhance this not only to &quot;important&quot; threads but define it a little bit more general:

do not expire threads, that contain messages marked as &quot;important&quot;, &quot;todo&quot;, &quot;new&quot;

the important is logically explained, the todo because this way, it would help also making todo&apos;s from folders with a mailinglist that is filling and emptying but the thread that todo is related stays as long it is not solved. the new i&apos;m not yet sure, so maybe it is not essentially needed for &quot;new&quot; to be kept.
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>495763</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Bram Schoenmakers">me</who>
    <bug_when>2006-12-24 00:35:32 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 139188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>495810</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Bram Schoenmakers">me</who>
    <bug_when>2006-12-24 13:21:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Todo messages won&apos;t expire in KDE 3.5.6.

If you don&apos;t want to expire &quot;new&quot; messages, just disable that in the Expiry dialog of that folder.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>