<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.kde.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugs.kde.org/"
          
          maintainer="sysadmin@kde.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>500902</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2025-03-01 13:43:53 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Memo from 5.1.92 data not displaying in transaction reports</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2025-04-08 16:27:55 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>2</classification_id>
          <classification>Applications</classification>
          <product>kmymoney</product>
          <component>reports</component>
          <version>5.1.92</version>
          <rep_platform>Mint (Ubuntu based)</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>NOR</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>0</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Mark Medoff">markm10538</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="KMyMoney Devel Mailing List">kmymoney-devel</assigned_to>
          
          
          <cf_commitlink>https://invent.kde.org/office/kmymoney/-/commit/4328584181dcf36367cc49b33960900b7e7b1a25</cf_commitlink>
          <cf_versionfixedin>5.2</cf_versionfixedin>
          <cf_sentryurl></cf_sentryurl>
          <votes>0</votes>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2403804</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Medoff">markm10538</who>
    <bug_when>2025-03-01 13:43:53 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>***
If you&apos;re not sure this is actually a bug, instead post about it at https://discuss.kde.org

If you&apos;re reporting a crash, attach a backtrace with debug symbols; see https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Debugging/How_to_create_useful_crash_reports

Please remove this comment after reading and before submitting - thanks!
***

SUMMARY
Memo field data entered in 5.1.92 do not display on reports. Data entered from Stable version of program still display correctly

STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. Create file using older 5.1 program
2. Update file in 5.1.92 program
3. Run Transaction Report and display Memo field

OBSERVED RESULT
Memo field displays data correctly for old data
Memo field is blank for data entered in 5.1.92

EXPECTED RESULT
All memo fields should display

SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows: 
macOS: 
(available in the Info Center app, or by running `kinfo` in a terminal window)
Linux/KDE Plasma: 
KDE Plasma Version: 
KDE Frameworks Version: 
Qt Version: 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2403898</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Jack">ostroffjh</who>
    <bug_when>2025-03-01 20:21:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>There is a memo field stored with the transaction itself, and also with each split.  I wonder if the difference is not because of a change in display, but a change in where the memo you enter it actually stored (or perhaps some combination.)  In 5.1.92, if you right click on a transaction, one of the options is &quot;Show transaction details.&quot;  Please do this for one old and one new transaction, looking specifically which memo fields have values.  You can either describe any differences you find, or attach screen shots of the details pop-up for each.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2403976</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Thomas Baumgart">tbaumgart</who>
    <bug_when>2025-03-02 08:59:36 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I could imagine that the memo is only assigned to one split using 5.1.92 and on both using 5.1 but wait until we receive the details from Mark. I think the difference of the memo field in the transaction object vs. the one in the split object is not related here. Nowadays, only the one in the split is used (AFAICT).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2403992</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
      <attachid>179036</attachid>
    <who name="Mark Medoff">markm10538</who>
    <bug_when>2025-03-02 10:55:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 179036
attachment-149704-0.html

It seems that there is a difference in how the memo field is stored in 
5.1.3 v 5.1.92:

When I enter a transaction with a memo in an account in *5.1.3*, the 
memo is stored in the split for *both* the account and the category.

In *5.1.92*. the memo is stored in the split for the account *only* and 
not in the second split for the category. Therefore, when I run a 
category report, the memo doesn&apos;t show on the report.

Mark

On 3/1/25 3:21 PM, Jack wrote:
&gt; https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500902
&gt;
&gt; Jack&lt;ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net&gt; changed:
&gt;
&gt;             What    |Removed                     |Added
&gt; ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
&gt;               Status|REPORTED                    |NEEDSINFO
&gt;           Resolution|---                         |WAITINGFORINFO
&gt;
&gt; --- Comment #1 from Jack&lt;ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net&gt; ---
&gt; There is a memo field stored with the transaction itself, and also with each
&gt; split.  I wonder if the difference is not because of a change in display, but a
&gt; change in where the memo you enter it actually stored (or perhaps some
&gt; combination.)  In 5.1.92, if you right click on a transaction, one of the
&gt; options is &quot;Show transaction details.&quot;  Please do this for one old and one new
&gt; transaction, looking specifically which memo fields have values.  You can
&gt; either describe any differences you find, or attach screen shots of the details
&gt; pop-up for each.
&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2404018</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
      <attachid>179039</attachid>
    <who name="Mark Medoff">markm10538</who>
    <bug_when>2025-03-02 13:41:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 179039
attachment-184698-0.html

It seems that there is a difference in how the memo field is stored in
5.1.3 v 5.1.92:

When I enter a transaction with a memo in an account in *5.1.3*, the memo
is stored in the split for *both* the account and the category.

In *5.1.92*. the memo is stored in the split for the account only andbut
not in the second split for the category. Therefore, when I run a category
report, the memo doesn&apos;t show on the report.
On 3/1/25 3:21 PM, Jack wrote:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500902

Jack &lt;ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net&gt;
&lt;ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REPORTED                    |NEEDSINFO
         Resolution|---                         |WAITINGFORINFO

--- Comment #1 from Jack &lt;ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net&gt;
&lt;ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net&gt; ---
There is a memo field stored with the transaction itself, and also with each
split.  I wonder if the difference is not because of a change in display, but a
change in where the memo you enter it actually stored (or perhaps some
combination.)  In 5.1.92, if you right click on a transaction, one of the
options is &quot;Show transaction details.&quot;  Please do this for one old and one new
transaction, looking specifically which memo fields have values.  You can
either describe any differences you find, or attach screen shots of the details
pop-up for each.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2408284</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Bug Janitor Service">bug-janitor</who>
    <bug_when>2025-03-17 03:47:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>🐛🧹 ⚠️ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug status to REPORTED. If there is no change for at least 30 days, it will be automatically closed as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.

For more information about our bug triaging procedures, please read https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2412181</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Bug Janitor Service">bug-janitor</who>
    <bug_when>2025-04-01 03:46:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>🐛🧹 This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 30 days. Closing as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2413631</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Jack">ostroffjh</who>
    <bug_when>2025-04-06 20:15:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Mark - when you reply by email, please delete everything except your new comment, as the entire email becomes the next comment.  Also, please do not send HTML emails as they create unnecessary attachments for the HTML version of each message.

Changing status.  
Clearly the behavior has changed since 5.1.3, but I&apos;m not sure whether there is anything which can easily be done now.  At some point, we will need to revisit the ability to change the memo field in a split other than the one being currently displayed in the Ledger.  Perhaps this can be left as a wishlist, with the eventual change still to be decided.

In the meantime, you can check the memo in each split using the Show Transaction Details feature, and then go to the ledger for the split you may want to change.  I&apos;ve recently had to do this for many transactions when preparing several reports in preparation of filing my taxes, so I agree the current process needs some change, even if I am not sure exactly what.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2413743</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Medoff">markm10538</who>
    <bug_when>2025-04-07 11:59:57 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Thank you for the explanation.

When considering the wish list for modifying the memo behavior, please 
reconsider how these fields were handled with the Stable version:

In the Stable version, the memo was applied to both sides of the split 
transaction and modifying either of the splits would generate a dialog 
asking if you wanted to apply the same change to the other split.

This seems like ideal behavior.

Mark</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2414072</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Thomas Baumgart">thb</who>
    <bug_when>2025-04-08 16:27:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Git commit 4328584181dcf36367cc49b33960900b7e7b1a25 by Thomas Baumgart.
Committed on 08/04/2025 at 16:27.
Pushed by tbaumgart into branch &apos;master&apos;.

Copy memo in unsplit transaction

This will bring back the functionality that is implemented in
previous releases of the project (5.1.x).
FIXED-IN: 5.2

M  +3    -0    kmymoney/mymoney/splitmodel.cpp
M  +33   -0    kmymoney/views/newtransactioneditor.cpp

https://invent.kde.org/office/kmymoney/-/commit/4328584181dcf36367cc49b33960900b7e7b1a25</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>179036</attachid>
            <date>2025-03-02 10:55:50 +0000</date>
            <delta_ts>2025-03-02 10:55:50 +0000</delta_ts>
            <desc>attachment-149704-0.html</desc>
            <filename>attachment-149704-0.html</filename>
            <type>text/html</type>
            <size>2145</size>
            <attacher name="Mark Medoff">markm10538</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">PCFET0NUWVBFIGh0bWw+CjxodG1sPgogIDxoZWFkPgogICAgPG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29u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</data>

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>179039</attachid>
            <date>2025-03-02 13:41:55 +0000</date>
            <delta_ts>2025-03-02 13:41:55 +0000</delta_ts>
            <desc>attachment-184698-0.html</desc>
            <filename>attachment-184698-0.html</filename>
            <type>text/html</type>
            <size>1945</size>
            <attacher name="Mark Medoff">markm10538</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">PGRpdiBkaXI9ImF1dG8iPjx1PjwvdT4KCiAgCiAgICAKICAKICA8ZGl2PgogICAgPHA+SXQgc2Vl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</data>

          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>