<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.kde.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugs.kde.org/"
          
          maintainer="sysadmin@kde.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>350731</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2015-07-29 07:01:53 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[4.81 beta1] akregator in kontact: read messages are removed from unread filter immediately</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2017-12-28 19:38:09 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>2</classification_id>
          <classification>Applications</classification>
          <product>akregator</product>
          <component>general</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>Arch Linux</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          <see_also>https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259813</see_also>
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>NOR</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>qqqqqqqqq9</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="kdepim bugs">pim-bugs-null</assigned_to>
          <cc>alvarenga</cc>
    
    <cc>cfeck</cc>
    
    <cc>christopherheiny</cc>
    
    <cc>cornelis</cc>
    
    <cc>darwin_te</cc>
    
    <cc>d_corkrey</cc>
    
    <cc>e8hffff</cc>
    
    <cc>erik</cc>
    
    <cc>francescvc666</cc>
    
    <cc>gabrimonfa</cc>
    
    <cc>Harald.Demian.Brunner</cc>
    
    <cc>j.pigeot</cc>
    
    <cc>jaak</cc>
    
    <cc>javier.ramoshidalgo</cc>
    
    <cc>jjm</cc>
    
    <cc>jsamyth</cc>
    
    <cc>j_kolberg11</cc>
    
    <cc>j__n</cc>
    
    <cc>kde</cc>
    
    <cc>kde</cc>
    
    <cc>kde</cc>
    
    <cc>kde</cc>
    
    <cc>kde</cc>
    
    <cc>koalinux</cc>
    
    <cc>lordheavym</cc>
    
    <cc>luigi.toscano</cc>
    
    <cc>manz</cc>
    
    <cc>maql.nju</cc>
    
    <cc>markus.zimmermann</cc>
    
    <cc>martin.tlustos</cc>
    
    <cc>mieszcz</cc>
    
    <cc>moltonel</cc>
    
    <cc>naughtypine</cc>
    
    <cc>niflheimr</cc>
    
    <cc>olaf.the.lost.viking</cc>
    
    <cc>paul.noel1</cc>
    
    <cc>porrascristian</cc>
    
    <cc>rewarp</cc>
    
    <cc>rynolangner</cc>
    
    <cc>shai</cc>
    
    <cc>smc+kdebugs</cc>
    
    <cc>steve</cc>
    
    <cc>sven</cc>
    
    <cc>tahall256</cc>
    
    <cc>thoppels</cc>
    
    <cc>tom-kde.bugs</cc>
    
    <cc>tonymt00</cc>
    
    <cc>yyc1992</cc>
          
          <cf_commitlink>https://commits.kde.org/akregator/c2d31a56f0d45858706e9a0af9227a24f8e55483</cf_commitlink>
          <cf_versionfixedin></cf_versionfixedin>
          <cf_sentryurl></cf_sentryurl>
          <votes>423</votes>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1533945</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="">qqqqqqqqq9</who>
    <bug_when>2015-07-29 07:01:53 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>When the unread filter is on, it is applied *immediately* after selecting an unread messages. It then hides this message. It walks through feed until there are no further unread messages. 
This makes the unread-filter pretty useless.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. set filter to unread
2. select a feed with unread messages
3. select the first unread messages

Actual Results:  
The message is shown, marked read and removed from the list.
Then akregator moves on to the next messages.
The goes on until there are now further unread messages in the feed. 

Expected Results:  
The message is shown, marked read and stays to be read.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1539477</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="e8hffff">e8hffff</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-25 13:24:36 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>CONFIRMED</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1539479</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="e8hffff">e8hffff</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-25 13:26:59 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>As soon as you click an unread item all unread items are instantly marked as read.    I&apos;ve tried putting key shortcuts to default in case there was some strange mouse assignment to mark-all-feeds-as-read.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1540079</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Jérôme Pigeot">j.pigeot</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-28 16:06:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>CONFIRMED as well</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1547035</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="S Clark">smc+kdebugs</who>
    <bug_when>2015-09-29 15:15:11 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Also confirmed...

This seems to specifically be a problem with the behavior around the &quot;mark selected article read after...&quot; advanced setting.  I think this defaults to 0 seconds (i.e. immediately) which is what I used to have it set to. Previously, this just meant the article was marked &quot;read&quot; as soon as it was clicked, and if you had the unread filter set, it would then disappear from the list AFTER you clicked away from it to another article.  Now the article is immediately removed from the list, causing the selection to automagically drop to the next, mark *it* unread, remove it, etc.

You can watch it happen more slowly if you go to settings -&gt; configure akregator -&gt; advanced and set it to mark as read after, say, 5 seconds.

Perhaps this bug should just read &quot;Read articles should not be removed by the unread filter while the article is selected&quot;?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1547689</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Tom Hall">tahall256</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-03 08:47:03 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Also happens if the status filter is set to &apos;New&apos;, presumably because articles aren&apos;t new once they&apos;ve been read.

&quot;Read articles should not be removed by the unread filter while the article is selected&quot; sounds like a good solution.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1552117</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Martin Tlustos">martin.tlustos</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-23 13:12:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Confirmed here with akregator 5.0.2 and Kubuntu 15.10</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1552433</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Jaak Ristioja">jaak</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-24 21:45:42 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to Martin Tlustos from comment #6)
&gt; Confirmed here with akregator 5.0.2 and Kubuntu 15.10

Same here. Data loss! I mean how is one later supposed to figure out which messages one missed to read after this happens?! ARGHH!! ;-[

(Voting for this one)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1552469</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Shai">shai</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-25 07:04:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to S Clark from comment #4)
&gt; Perhaps this bug should just read &quot;Read articles should not be removed by
&gt; the unread filter while the article is selected&quot;?

That&apos;s a compromise, not an ideal solution. The ideal solution is akregator 4.x behavior -- the &quot;unread&quot; filter is not applied continuously, but only upon selection of a folder (or, of course, changing of filter). This means if you enter a feed and have 3 unread items, once you&apos;ve read them all, you see 3 read items.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1552470</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Shai">shai</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-25 07:05:43 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1553298</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-29 02:27:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 354531 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1554133</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2015-11-02 10:38:23 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 354721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1562906</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
    <who name="OlafLostViking">olaf.the.lost.viking</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-12 17:40:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Still valid for Akregator included in 15.08.3</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1565308</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-22 11:43:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 356978 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1574045</commentid>
    <comment_count>14</comment_count>
    <who name="Rolf Eike Beer">kde</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-01 17:15:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 353958 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1574047</commentid>
    <comment_count>15</comment_count>
    <who name="Rolf Eike Beer">kde</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-01 17:15:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 354746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1574664</commentid>
    <comment_count>16</comment_count>
    <who name="Francesc Xavier Vinyals i Carreró">francescvc666</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-03 22:42:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Same problem with Kubuntu 15.04 and Akregator 5.0.2</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1575092</commentid>
    <comment_count>17</comment_count>
    <who name="John Andersen">jsamyth</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-05 19:43:25 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Still appearing in 
Akregator Version 5.1.1
KDE Frameworks 5.18.0
Manjaro/Arch repositories
Running embedded within Kontact.

Since this happens every single time, it pretty much makes it impossible to read feeds showing only unread posts, as they all disappear from view. Certainly, even volunteer developers can track this down in 6 months.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1575100</commentid>
    <comment_count>18</comment_count>
    <who name="Harald Brunner">Harald.Demian.Brunner</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-05 19:59:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to John Andersen from comment #17)
&gt; Still appearing in 
&gt; Akregator Version 5.1.1
&gt; KDE Frameworks 5.18.0
&gt; Manjaro/Arch repositories
&gt; Running embedded within Kontact.
&gt; 
&gt; Since this happens every single time, it pretty much makes it impossible to
&gt; read feeds showing only unread posts, as they all disappear from view.
&gt; Certainly, even volunteer developers can track this down in 6 months.

You can go to Settings &gt; Advanced and disable the automatic marking as read, then use Ctrl+E to do it manually.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1578718</commentid>
    <comment_count>19</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-25 02:59:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 359543 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1590730</commentid>
    <comment_count>20</comment_count>
    <who name="OlafLostViking">olaf.the.lost.viking</who>
    <bug_when>2016-04-26 07:40:57 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Still valid for Akregator from Applications 16.04.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1601615</commentid>
    <comment_count>21</comment_count>
    <who name="Mirek Mieszczak">mieszcz</who>
    <bug_when>2016-06-16 13:51:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Same in gentoo until 16.04.2</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1601641</commentid>
    <comment_count>22</comment_count>
    <who name="Jaak Ristioja">jaak</who>
    <bug_when>2016-06-16 16:08:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to Mirek Mieszczak from comment #21)
&gt; Same in gentoo until 16.04.2

Is it fixed in 16.04.2 or you just haven&apos;t tested that version yet?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1601796</commentid>
    <comment_count>23</comment_count>
    <who name="Mirek Mieszczak">mieszcz</who>
    <bug_when>2016-06-17 06:29:46 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to Jaak Ristioja from comment #22)
&gt; (In reply to Mirek Mieszczak from comment #21)
&gt; &gt; Same in gentoo until 16.04.2
&gt; 
&gt; Is it fixed in 16.04.2 or you just haven&apos;t tested that version yet?

It is not fixed yet. Yesterday I just compiled version 16.04.2 and tested. Of course without success.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1606128</commentid>
    <comment_count>24</comment_count>
    <who name="EkriirkE">kde</who>
    <bug_when>2016-07-08 06:14:56 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Just upgraded Fedora to FC24, the new akregator is on Version 5.2.2.  After spending a long time trying to find where you newly hid the Unread/Important filter dropdown, the whole of all unread items quickly decreases to 0 when an unread new item headline is clicked for reading.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1606887</commentid>
    <comment_count>25</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2016-07-11 13:21:26 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 365329 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1615539</commentid>
    <comment_count>26</comment_count>
    <who name="Javier">javier.ramoshidalgo</who>
    <bug_when>2016-08-19 07:44:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Confirmed in akregator 5.2.3 on an archlinux system. :-(</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1619564</commentid>
    <comment_count>27</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2016-09-06 12:57:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 368324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1629846</commentid>
    <comment_count>28</comment_count>
    <who name="Markus Zimmermann">markus.zimmermann</who>
    <bug_when>2016-10-05 15:41:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I can also confirm this bug using openSUSE Tumbleweed snapshot 20161003 akregator5-16.08.1-1.2.x86_64</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1630003</commentid>
    <comment_count>29</comment_count>
    <who name="Christopher Heiny">christopherheiny</who>
    <bug_when>2016-10-06 04:34:19 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Confirmed in 5.3.0 on Fedora 24, latest update.

This pretty much renders akregator useless.  Any chance to bump this 14 month old bug up in priority and get a fix?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1633693</commentid>
    <comment_count>30</comment_count>
    <who name="Markus Zimmermann">markus.zimmermann</who>
    <bug_when>2016-10-19 15:11:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Still present in openSUSE Tumbleweed Snapshot 20161018 akregator5-16.08.2-1.1.x86_64</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1642280</commentid>
    <comment_count>31</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2016-11-28 17:24:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 373018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1643248</commentid>
    <comment_count>32</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2016-12-04 03:29:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 373229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1643301</commentid>
    <comment_count>33</comment_count>
    <who name="darwin te">darwin_te</who>
    <bug_when>2016-12-04 13:38:58 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Is this fixed already? I am using kde neon 5.8.4. (Based on Ubuntu 16.04)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1643302</commentid>
    <comment_count>34</comment_count>
    <who name="darwin te">darwin_te</who>
    <bug_when>2016-12-04 13:39:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Is this fixed already? I am using kde neon 5.8.4. (Based on Ubuntu 16.04)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1643303</commentid>
    <comment_count>35</comment_count>
    <who name="darwin te">darwin_te</who>
    <bug_when>2016-12-04 13:39:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Is this fixed already? I am using kde neon 5.8.4. (Based on Ubuntu 16.04)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1645928</commentid>
    <comment_count>36</comment_count>
    <who name="Vincent de Phily">moltonel</who>
    <bug_when>2016-12-19 13:01:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hitting this too after upgrading from 4.14 to 5.4.0 (package version 16.12.0).

In 4.14 this only appened when when the interval fetching kicked in, which was not a show-stoper but was still annoying.

Bug 114263 is related to this, although approaching it from the other side.

IMHO articles should only be removed from the list after some human interaction, like clicking on a different feed or changing the search bar. Adding articles to the list should still happen ASAP.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1645957</commentid>
    <comment_count>37</comment_count>
    <who name="Vincent de Phily">moltonel</who>
    <bug_when>2016-12-19 15:22:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>For what it&apos;s worth, disabling &apos;mark selected article read after X seconds&apos; in the settings and using &apos;Crtl-E&apos; to mark them read manually (instead of relying on auto &apos;mark as read&apos;) makes akregator usable again.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1646368</commentid>
    <comment_count>38</comment_count>
    <who name="Erik van &apos;t Wout">erik</who>
    <bug_when>2016-12-20 21:47:29 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Not sure how useful this is, but I&apos;ve been testing - quite successfully - with below patch for the last few weeks.

Although the patch itself is rather ugly (it basically intercepts the processing of the &apos;Read&apos; event, bringing back 4.x comparable behaviour), I haven&apos;t seen any side effects of it yet. YMMV.

I don&apos;t expect this to be applied to official sources, but might be useful for people building their own binaries.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1646369</commentid>
    <comment_count>39</comment_count>
      <attachid>102908</attachid>
    <who name="Erik van &apos;t Wout">erik</who>
    <bug_when>2016-12-20 21:49:21 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 102908
Patch to intercept and selectively ignore the &apos;Article Read&apos; event</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1657478</commentid>
    <comment_count>40</comment_count>
    <who name="darwin te">darwin_te</who>
    <bug_when>2017-01-29 23:32:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Is this fixed already? I am using kde neon 5.8.5. (Based on Ubuntu 16.04)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1657490</commentid>
    <comment_count>41</comment_count>
    <who name="EkriirkE">kde</who>
    <bug_when>2017-01-30 03:18:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to darwin te from comment #40)
&gt; Is this fixed already? I am using kde neon 5.8.5. (Based on Ubuntu 16.04)

No, Akregator 5.3.3 in FC25 still clears all items

Uncheck &quot;Mark selected article read after&quot; under settings/advanced and use Ctrl+E to manually mark as read as you go through the feeds</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1662325</commentid>
    <comment_count>42</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2017-02-21 03:11:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 376649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1662645</commentid>
    <comment_count>43</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2017-02-22 16:12:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 376807 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1677893</commentid>
    <comment_count>44</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2017-05-26 17:13:22 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 380218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1677896</commentid>
    <comment_count>45</comment_count>
    <who name="darwin te">darwin_te</who>
    <bug_when>2017-05-26 17:20:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This is not fixed yet.  Any solution or estimate?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1685098</commentid>
    <comment_count>46</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2017-06-25 09:54:42 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 381425 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1698499</commentid>
    <comment_count>47</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2017-09-03 12:11:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 384256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1702343</commentid>
    <comment_count>48</comment_count>
    <who name="darwin te">darwin_te</who>
    <bug_when>2017-09-21 16:05:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This is not fixed yet.  Any solution or estimate?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1702360</commentid>
    <comment_count>49</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Marten">jjm</who>
    <bug_when>2017-09-21 17:42:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Patch submitted at https://phabricator.kde.org/D7928</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1703603</commentid>
    <comment_count>50</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Marten">jjm</who>
    <bug_when>2017-09-29 15:58:53 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Git commit 08fe30f0973b69101fdedce1a167f74792eb4c5f by Jonathan Marten.
Committed on 29/09/2017 at 15:57.
Pushed by marten into branch &apos;master&apos;.

Do not remove read messages from the unread filter immediately

Otherwise, when using the filter, the next message will also be selected
and immediately marked as read, until the feed is empty.

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D7928

M  +1    -1    src/article.cpp
M  +5    -3    src/feed/feed.cpp
M  +6    -3    src/feed/feed.h

https://commits.kde.org/akregator/08fe30f0973b69101fdedce1a167f74792eb4c5f</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1703607</commentid>
    <comment_count>51</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Marten">jjm</who>
    <bug_when>2017-09-29 16:38:42 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Git commit bb7f35c7938e8e18ac83dcc98b43b69ac2772f6c by Jonathan Marten, on behalf of Erik van &apos;t Wout.
Committed on 29/09/2017 at 16:30.
Pushed by marten into branch &apos;master&apos;.

Do not remove read messages from the unread filter immediately

Otherwise, when using the filter, the next message will also be selected
and immediately marked as read, until the feed is empty.

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D7928

M  +1    -1    src/article.cpp
M  +5    -3    src/feed/feed.cpp
M  +6    -3    src/feed/feed.h

https://commits.kde.org/akregator/bb7f35c7938e8e18ac83dcc98b43b69ac2772f6c</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1703608</commentid>
    <comment_count>52</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Marten">jjm</who>
    <bug_when>2017-09-29 16:40:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Git commit c2d31a56f0d45858706e9a0af9227a24f8e55483 by Jonathan Marten, on behalf of Erik van &apos;t Wout.
Committed on 29/09/2017 at 16:39.
Pushed by marten into branch &apos;Applications/17.08&apos;.

Do not remove read messages from the unread filter immediately

Otherwise, when using the filter, the next message will also be selected
and immediately marked as read, until the feed is empty.

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D7928

M  +1    -1    src/article.cpp
M  +5    -3    src/feed/feed.cpp
M  +6    -3    src/feed/feed.h

https://commits.kde.org/akregator/c2d31a56f0d45858706e9a0af9227a24f8e55483</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1718816</commentid>
    <comment_count>53</comment_count>
    <who name="Christoph Feck">cfeck</who>
    <bug_when>2017-12-28 19:38:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 387883 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>102908</attachid>
            <date>2016-12-20 21:49:21 +0000</date>
            <delta_ts>2016-12-20 21:49:21 +0000</delta_ts>
            <desc>Patch to intercept and selectively ignore the &apos;Article Read&apos; event</desc>
            <filename>akregator-16.08.3-article-read-loop-with-unread-filter-enabled.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>2089</size>
            <attacher name="Erik van &apos;t Wout">erik</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">ZGlmZiAtdU5yIGtkZXBpbS0xNi4wOC4zLm9yaWcvYWtyZWdhdG9yL3NyYy9hcnRpY2xlLmNwcCBr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</data>

          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>