<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.kde.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugs.kde.org/"
          
          maintainer="sysadmin@kde.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>238761</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2010-05-25 07:31:28 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>j to scroll down, k to scroll up</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-01-31 14:23:16 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>10</classification_id>
          <classification>Unmaintained</classification>
          <product>rekonq</product>
          <component>general</component>
          <version>0.4.0</version>
          <rep_platform>Gentoo Packages</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>NOR</priority>
          <bug_severity>wishlist</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>277855</dependson>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Corey">corey_s</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Andrea Diamantini">adjam7</assigned_to>
          <cc>asiasuppenesser</cc>
    
    <cc>corey_s</cc>
    
    <cc>cubranic</cc>
    
    <cc>eternalfuzzy1</cc>
          
          <cf_commitlink></cf_commitlink>
          <cf_versionfixedin></cf_versionfixedin>
          <cf_sentryurl></cf_sentryurl>
          <votes>20</votes>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>966883</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Corey">corey_s</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-25 07:31:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Version:           0.4.0 (using KDE 4.4.3) 
OS:                Linux

There&apos;s a possibly somewhat obscure feature that I really love in konqueror -- the ability to scroll down with the &apos;j&apos; key, and up with the &apos;k&apos; key, ala vim.

This appears to be built-in on konqueror, but I see no reason why it couldn&apos;t at least be a shortcuts configuration. 

However implemented, it&apos;s really nice because it keeps my fingers from moving off the keyboard home row while I scan/read/skim through web pages - it&apos;d be great if rekonq could provide this same, albeit arguably minor, bit of convenience!

Thanks, and kind regards to the developers - rekonq is quickly becoming my preferred browser of choice!



Reproducible: Didn&apos;t try</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>966884</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Corey">corey_s</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-25 07:33:46 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>
(I guess if j/k is implemented for scroll page up/down; then perhaps h/l can also be used for scroll page left/right - again, ala vi keybindings)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1115700</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Thomas Murach">asiasuppenesser</who>
    <bug_when>2011-05-06 19:33:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Is this still wanted? If so, I could implement this. I&apos;ll wait for your replies.
Best regards,
Thomas</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1117160</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="">eternalfuzzy1</who>
    <bug_when>2011-05-09 21:15:43 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I would still appreciate this feature.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1119835</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Davor Cubranic">cubranic</who>
    <bug_when>2011-05-16 07:16:26 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I also miss this great Konqueror feature in Rekonq.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1119954</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Thomas Murach">asiasuppenesser</who>
    <bug_when>2011-05-16 13:20:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Alright, I&apos;ll see what I can do!</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1136213</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Andrea Diamantini">adjam7</who>
    <bug_when>2011-06-27 22:02:53 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Git commit be0d469407cb2126fb73bd6ee7c476743b9a046f by Andrea Diamantini.
Committed on 27/06/2011 at 23:58.
Pushed by adjam into branch &apos;master&apos;.

Add shortcuts for scrolling as in vi or konqi

BUG:238761

Patch by Thomas Murach, thanks :D

Reviewed by me ;)

M  +21   -0    src/webview.cpp     

http://commits.kde.org/rekonq/be0d469407cb2126fb73bd6ee7c476743b9a046f</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1136624</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Davor Cubranic">cubranic</who>
    <bug_when>2011-06-29 06:18:29 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>These are not configurable shortcuts, judging by the commit diff?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1148710</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Andrea Diamantini">adjam7</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-02 09:15:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Git commit a47bb9051d9a3253c1a325bd7e9d6910780cb9cd by Andrea Diamantini.
Committed on 02/08/2011 at 11:12.
Pushed by adjam into branch &apos;master&apos;.

Revert vi-like shortcuts implementation

In fact, until we have one way to understand if a widget (eg: a
lineedit or a textarea) steals the focus before, this feature will
break their usage.

CCBUG: 238761

M  +0    -22   src/webview.cpp

http://commits.kde.org/rekonq/a47bb9051d9a3253c1a325bd7e9d6910780cb9cd</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1154017</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Davor Cubranic">cubranic</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-15 17:02:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The bug should be reopened now that you reverted the fix, no?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1155841</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Andrea Diamantini">adjam7</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-21 16:15:37 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Git commit 4743583e3852d616daf7a7ade480ac5d04295474 by Andrea Diamantini, on behalf of Johannes Troscher.
Committed on 21/08/2011 at 18:15.
Pushed by adjam into branch &apos;master&apos;.

Fix vi-like navigation shortcuts

This patch introduces a check on input/textarea elements to be sure
we are NOT stealing focus there.. ;)
It also introduces a check to let the feature being optional (just to
be completely sure... )

CCBUG: 238761
REVIEW: 102255
REVIEWED-BY: adjam,elproxy

M  +12   -5    src/settings/settings_general.ui
M  +3    -0    src/rekonq.kcfg
M  +29   -0    src/webview.cpp

http://commits.kde.org/rekonq/4743583e3852d616daf7a7ade480ac5d04295474</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1220761</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Davor Cubranic">cubranic</who>
    <bug_when>2012-01-30 15:28:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>j/k still don&apos;t work for me: 0.8.0 on KUbuntu 11.10</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1221021</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
    <who name="Andrea Diamantini">adjam7</who>
    <bug_when>2012-01-31 07:24:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #11)
&gt; j/k still don&apos;t work for me: 0.8.0 on KUbuntu 11.10

Davor, the fix is for master, hence 0.9. At least you can expect it for a bugfix release, (0.8.1, 0.8.2), but it&apos;s obvious it cannot work in your running 0.8. I don&apos;t know how I can explain this...</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1221224</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
    <who name="Davor Cubranic">cubranic</who>
    <bug_when>2012-01-31 14:23:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Sorry, I thought 0.8 came out after the fix was released.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>