Version: 1.0-beta5 "Pierre" (using KDE 3.2.3, Gentoo) Compiler: gcc version 3.3.3 20040412 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.3-r6, ssp-3.3.2-2, pie-8.7.6) OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.7-win4lin-r3 I presume filters are on the to-do-list. The KMail approach seems well suited since it matches are primary for text. You can even implement move the virtual folders options. As a bonus there are x% of people who will know how to use them automatically. Additional bonus is most of the work has already been done and refined. ;)
According my opinion, this is already in aKregator (beta 3 or later). So this can be closed.
Charles, there's a Speed filter (Search:) input line at the top, i think its mostly enough, you can filter through any subset of your feeds with it, so I don't see the reason for more complex filters now.
maybe I should elaborate... most of the code already exists, so no need to duplicate that effort. I am talking about things like... 1) move to vfolder (primarily for this idea) so I can then select all thing related to the election, move them to an election vfolder, those related to bush in a subfolder bush, those related to kelly in a subfolder kelly thus election bush kelly 2) mark read (skip things I am not interested in) 3) delete (get rid of things I will never be interested in) 4) delete if count exceeds x delete if count exceeds x in only the election directory 5) delete if older than x move if older to... 6) move to vfolder if marked saved 7) edit headline to... 8) search description for x 9) export listing to script (can generate nice html files this way) notice how implementing a filter based system is adaptable and flexible so instead of implementing a gui for each configurational item it can be done through a filter. implementing a new idea is more add item to filter and plug in code, not redo gui since you are developing the program now is a good time to considered it. That is all, have a nice day. :)
*** Bug 107492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This is in fact a duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 85615 ***