Bug 65567

Summary:	[PATCH] Build fix for alternate DB3/4 installations
Product:	[Applications] kdevelop	Reporter:	Melvyn Sopacua <melvyn>
Component:	general	Assignee:	KDevelop Developers <kdevelop-devel>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal
Priority:	NOR
Version:	3.0.0a7
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	Compiled Sources
OS:	FreeBSD
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:
Attachments:	Berkeley DB compatibility

Description Melvyn Sopacua 2003-10-05 22:08:00 UTC

Version:           3.0 alpha7 (using KDE Devel)
Installed from:    Compiled sources
Compiler:          gcc version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD] 
OS:          FreeBSD

Background:
on FreeBSD one can have several installations of Berkeley DB libraries. In the base system, there's the ancient 1.85 version. Other versions installed by the portscollection have their library and header location renamed to avoid conflicts.

The patch attached shortly fixes build problems on FreeBSD. To build correctly the appropreate values for db-dir and db-name need to be given. Ports maintainers will easily be able to pick this up.

As a quick-fix I've added the inclusion of config.h on lib/catalog/gcatalog.h because several files seem to include it, before config.h is included leaving an undefined type for DB.

As a side note it fixes the install target on Bourne type shells.

Comment 1 Melvyn Sopacua 2003-10-05 22:09:38 UTC

Created attachment 2693 [details]
Berkeley DB compatibility

Comment 2 groot 2004-01-01 17:48:12 UTC

Patch looks ok, and I believe there's even one more version of db available now as a port. Unfortunately I'm not in a position to test or experiment. Melvyn, you may want to send a message to kde@freebsd, to see if there's someone there with a kdevelop that can be experimented with.

Comment 3 Harald Fernengel 2004-01-02 16:25:19 UTC

The patch looks good, but why did you put the check into configure.in.in instead of kdevelop.m4.in with the rest of the checks? I'd rather have the ugly parts in kdevelop.m4.in so that configure.in.in is readable.

Harry

Comment 4 Will Andrews 2004-01-04 07:21:58 UTC

I'm sure it doesn't make any difference as long as the same result is achieved.  So if you want to do it that way, I don't think the reporter would have any objections.

Comment 5 Melvyn Sopacua 2004-01-06 20:32:09 UTC

Subject: Re:  [PATCH] Build fix for alternate DB3/4 installations

On Sunday 04 January 2004 07:22, you wrote:

> ------- Additional Comments From will@csociety.org  2004-01-04 07:21
> ------- I'm sure it doesn't make any difference as long as the same result
> is achieved.  So if you want to do it that way, I don't think the reporter
> would have any objections.

IIRC I tried first in kdevelop.m4 but that didn't work. I haven't chased the 
cause, but it had something to do with the availablity of certain macro's.

If you can get it working, of course I have no objections.

Comment 6 Amilcar do Carmo Lucas 2004-07-19 23:31:38 UTC

This is fixed in HEAD