Bug 51072

Summary: After leave kmail running: older mail gets named unknown.
Product: [Applications] kmail Reporter: Jay Scherrer <jay>
Component: generalAssignee: kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal    
Priority: NOR    
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: RedHat Enterprise Linux   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:

Description Jay Scherrer 2002-11-22 23:33:45 UTC
Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.0.4)
Installed from:    RedHat RPMs
OS:          Linux

After leaving kmail running, some new unread mail looses it's subject and all other data. And if you click the next message to be read, it to gets posted as unknown. On down the list.
Jay
Comment 1 Carsten Burghardt 2002-11-23 12:38:55 UTC
Please try to remove the index-file (~/Mail/.<foldername>.index*) of this folder after 
backing up your Mail-dir 
Comment 2 Till Adam 2003-06-08 17:57:54 UTC
Jay, are you still seeing this issue with kmail 1.5.2? 
Comment 3 Jay Scherrer 2003-06-09 06:00:31 UTC
Subject: Re:  After leave kmail running: older mail gets named unknown.

Yes.
I've just installed rh9 with Kmail 1.5 (Using KDE 3.1-11 Red HAT).
apparently the .inbox.index and the .inbox.index.ids within the Mail directory 
gets corrupted. 
My solution: 
Once I see messages listed as: 
	Sender: unknown 	Sender: unknown  
I immediately shut down Kmail and delete the files .inbox.index and 
.inbox.index.ids from the Mail directory, then I restart Kmail. Everything is 
fixed. I hope this helps.
Jay

On Sunday 08 June 2003 08:57 am, you wrote:
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From till@adam-lilienthal.de  2003-06-08 17:57
> ------- Jay, are you still seeing this issue with kmail 1.5.2?

Comment 4 Stephan Kulow 2003-09-20 10:54:30 UTC
it's surely one of the more annoying problems, but so far there is no pattern when it happens 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 55838 ***