Bug 197519

Summary: Add autoscroll support to rekonq
Product: [Applications] rekonq Reporter: Panagiotis Papadopoulos <pano_90>
Component: generalAssignee: Andrea Diamantini <adjam7>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: wishlist CC: leonardo.la.malfa, marcorion
Priority: NOR    
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Compiled Sources   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:

Description Panagiotis Papadopoulos 2009-06-22 17:54:59 UTC
Version:            (using Devel)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Compiled sources

It would be really nice, if Rekonq would have some sort of "autoscroll feature".
With "Autoscroll" I mean the function, that let's you scroll a webpage by clicking the middle mouse button and then moving the cursor up or down.

Thanks!
Comment 1 mb1 2009-07-14 23:58:17 UTC
I'll second this.  Rekonq is shaping up quite nicely otherwise in 0.1.8 otherwise.
Comment 2 Panagiotis Papadopoulos 2009-07-20 13:38:38 UTC
Is autoscroll a feature that has to get in (Qt)WebKit or is it something the applications have to "implement"?
Comment 3 Andrea Diamantini 2009-10-22 16:51:23 UTC
Implemented a first form in rekonq 0.2.70. Not sure about middle mouse click (I don't have one), but just SHIFT + up/down to start scrolling
Comment 4 Panagiotis Papadopoulos 2009-10-22 18:45:54 UTC
I think this wish is not yet implemented (the middle mouse button does not do yet what it should according to this wish).
So I think we better should let this one open :-)

Thanks :-)
Comment 5 Andrea Diamantini 2010-02-19 01:45:53 UTC
*** Bug 218380 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Panagiotis Papadopoulos 2010-04-03 18:33:22 UTC
as of some days auto scroll support with the shift key has been implemented. Thanks! Only middle mouse click auto scroll support still left :-)
Comment 7 Panagiotis Papadopoulos 2010-04-17 11:47:52 UTC
middle mouse click scroll support has landed in mainline git.
Thanks!
Comment 8 Panagiotis Papadopoulos 2010-05-15 15:59:46 UTC
*** Bug 237716 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***