Summary: | Too many task priorities, maybe in sense of usability it is enough to have 4 or 5 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] korganizer | Reporter: | Danas <dumas65> |
Component: | todoview | Assignee: | kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs> |
Status: | REPORTED --- | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | finex, smartins |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: |
Description
Danas
2008-03-21 11:18:57 UTC
I like this idea to give different behavior on the priority levels! It should be implemented on the new task list. Moreover I'll prefer to have 5 priority levels, not 4. But I've a question: if you need to sync your tasks with another app which use ten priority levels what should happen? I do not see big difference between 4 or 5 priority levels. 4 levels are most common in task management, so I was thinking just to use ABC system without reimplementing the wheel. h Actually I do not know any other PIM software which uses 10 priority levels. Ms Outlook uses 3 levels. No Idea about evolution or Sunbird... Answer to your question: we can use average level in middle and min/max levels on high-low priority tasks, e. g. 1=1, 2=4, 3=7, 4=10. Yes, it could be. :-) I'm ok with this idea. Can you write code? We are very short on manpower to implement this. |