Bug 146681

Summary: page displayed wrong: overlapping text (stylesheet issue?)
Product: [Applications] konqueror Reporter: Gregor B. Rosenauer <gregor.rosenauer>
Component: khtmlAssignee: Konqueror Developers <konq-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME    
Severity: normal    
Priority: NOR    
Version: 3.5   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:

Description Gregor B. Rosenauer 2007-06-11 23:00:13 UTC
Version:           3.5.7 (using KDE 3.5.7, Kubuntu (feisty) 4:3.5.7-0ubuntu1~feisty2)
Compiler:          Target: i486-linux-gnu
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.22-2-386

The page at
http://www.rdiffweb.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
is rendered wrong in Konqueror, the text is displayed with overlapping lines, which confuses navigation (and reading;).
Firefox 2.0.0.4 renders the page correctly.
I am using the standard stylesheet as defined by the page and no custom settings.
Comment 1 Tommi Tervo 2007-06-12 13:39:17 UTC
Hmm, user agent spoofing doesn't work, they send us following stylesheet:
http://www.rdiffweb.org//wiki/skins/monobook/KHTMLFixes.css

var is_khtml = (navigator.vendor == 'KDE' || ( document.childNodes && !document.all && !navigator.taintEnabled ));

Page looks fine in konqueror when I changed that stylesheet to Opera7Fixes.css from DOM tree viewer. Propably webmaster call... 
Comment 2 A. Spehr 2008-04-24 11:23:38 UTC
The page looks fine to me, and nareshov is playing CSS expert and says the bug does not seem to exist in the CSS in here. 

svn 4.0branch r793993
Comment 3 Naresh V 2008-04-24 11:49:33 UTC
The pages renders fine on Konqueror 3.5.7. And there isn't any KHTML specific CSS that is being used on that site anymore (although the file KHTMLFixes.css exists - which was probably part of an old 'monobook' theme).
(The monobook theme is the default Mediawiki theme - the same thing you see on the wikpedia.)
Moreover, KHTMLFixes.css contains just 1 line that apparently tried to fix an horizontal-scrollbar issue.
Comment 4 Gregor B. Rosenauer 2008-04-30 22:16:05 UTC
true, the page seems to have changed in the meantime, but I also upgraded to KDE 3.5.9.