Summary: | Xsession error for (some) tcsh users | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | kdm | Reporter: | Jim <zsd> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | kdm bugs tracker <kdm-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Slackware | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: |
Description
Jim
2006-12-28 20:59:38 UTC
hmm, a shell might not have noclobber and consequently no >! operator, so it needs to be tested. /me wonders, whether this csh hack will ever work reliably ... Ummm... on my version of tcsh, unsetting noclobber has no effect on the existence of >! Are you hypothesizing this or do you have an example of such a shell? Jim it might surprise you, but there are other cshs than tcsh out there. i'm also ready to believe that some old tcshs don't have the feature, either, but it's improbable that they are deployed together with kde. No, it doesn't surprise me at all, I used csh for many years before I found out about tcsh. But I don't recall any version of csh or tcsh that I used as only implementing >! if noclobber is set. (That would seem like a strange thing to do, in my opinion.) I'm not sure why you think old tcshs (or cshs) don't have this feature. I did a quick web search for csh man pages and came across a few older ones, and they all include the >! syntax. So again, is your concern mere speculation or have you ever seen a version of csh or tcsh that doesn't have >! ? I suggest one way to find out is to make the change and see if anyone complains. > I don't recall any version of csh or tcsh that I used as only > implementing >! if noclobber is set. > who exactly claimed such a thing? ;) > I did a quick web search for csh man pages and came across > a few older ones, and they all include the >! syntax. > now, that convinces me to give it a shot - in kde 4 and 3.5.7, that is. |